Trust & Proof: Deeks & King – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

Deeks & King

(http://www.deeksandking.co.uk) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 22, 2026
Trust & Proof — The Lens

Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.

Trust & Proof Verifiable evidence vs. Trust Theatre.
8 Impact Weight: 20 / 100
40% Reputation

With a review_count of 0 and a proof_links_count of 0, the site avoids fake reviews but fails on claims verification. The assertion of being AAT Licensed is a high-stakes professional claim that lacks a corresponding license number or outbound verification link to the AAT register. Every service claim in the meta data remains unsubstantiated by external proof paths.

The ratio of verifiable evidence to assertions is 0:1, as all signals are confined to metadata with zero textual support. There are no links to professional registrations, indemnity insurance details, or specific client industry specializations. The total specificity count is zero across all primary evidence categories.

Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.

🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
0Review mentions (all pages)
0External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 0 0
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
Homepage — no schema detected (entity gap)