Trust & Proof: ing. arch. Blanka Tancerová – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

ing. arch. Blanka Tancerová

(https://visky.cz) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 24, 2026
Trust & Proof — The Lens

Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.

Trust & Proof Verifiable evidence vs. Trust Theatre.
12 Impact Weight: 20 / 100
60% Reputation

The site currently has a review_count of 0 and a proof_links_count of 0, meaning it does not engage in ‘Trust Theatre’ (fake reviews), but it also provides no external proof paths. The trust_theatre_flag is false only because there is an absence of claims rather than a presence of verified ones. The site fails the proof expectation for professional registration numbers or linked testimonials.

The proof density is effectively zero; for every one general claim of service, there are zero verifiable links, named clients, or dated project examples. The site relies entirely on the user’s inherent trust of the professional title rather than providing evidence of work completed. There is a total absence of specific proof points like planning permission successes or budget adherence examples.

Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.

🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
0Review mentions (all pages)
0External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 0 0
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
Homepage — no schema detected (entity gap)