Liquid Network
(https://liquid.net) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 27, 2026Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.
Authority is established by naming specific founders with high digital footprints in the Bitcoin space, such as Adam Back and Andrew Poelstra. However, a small authority gap exists as schema_json is null across the crawled pages, missing an opportunity to formally link these individuals via Person schema or SameAs links. The technical implementation is otherwise clean and professional.
Performance claims are grounded in verifiable on-chain data. Claims of being ‘secure and reliable’ are backed by the explanation that the network is built on Bitcoin’s UTXO model and codebase. The site provides specific figures for LBTC in circulation and average fee rates (0.1sat/vB), which are measurable outcomes rather than marketing assertions.
Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 0 | 0 |
| /federation/ | 0 | 0 |
| /developers/ | 0 | 0 |
| /enterprises/ | 0 | 0 |
This page presents a snapshot of public data from Liquid Network, captured on May 27, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Identity & Authority signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to Liquid Network: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://liquid.net to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.