Neo
(https://neo.org) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 24, 2026Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.
The primary gap lies in structured identity data; the ‘schema_json’ is null for the homepage, missing Organization or Person markers. While founders like Da Hongfei are mentioned in historical news items, there is a lack of a central ‘Doxxed Team’ section with verifiable digital footprints (LinkedIn/GitHub) in the provided crawl, though the ‘For Developers’ section links to high-authority GitHub repositories.
The site’s marketing tone is remarkably grounded in technical reality. Performance claims like ‘One Block Finality’ are immediately followed by the technical explanation of the ‘dBFT consensus mechanism.’ There are no ‘guaranteed returns’ or ‘to the moon’ generic claims; instead, the site provides a GAS reward calculator based on circulating voting participation.
Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 0 | 2 |
| /gov/ | 0 | 1 |
| /neogas/ | 112 | 1 |
| /news/ | 20 | 1 |
This page presents a snapshot of public data from Neo, captured on May 24, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Identity & Authority signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to Neo: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://neo.org to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.