Trust & Proof: Terraswap – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

Terraswap

(https://terraswap.io) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 25, 2026
Trust & Proof — The Lens

Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.

Trust & Proof Verifiable evidence vs. Trust Theatre.
8 Impact Weight: 20 / 100
40% Reputation

With a review_count of 3 and a proof_links_count of 0, the site triggers a high trust theatre penalty for displaying social proof without external verification. The claim of ‘Strength security by blockchain audit’ is repeated in H5 tags, yet the data identifies no outbound proof links to the actual audit entities. This reliance on ‘Audited by’ badges without verifiable destinations is a hallmark of crypto-sector trust theatre.

The ratio of evidence to claims is low, as the site relies on assertions of being ‘open source’ and ‘decentralized’ without linking to a GitHub repository or contract addresses within the crawled body text. Only 7 specific proof points (token standards, wallet names, lab name) were identified against a backdrop of broad marketing claims. The absence of external proof paths (proof_links_count: 0) suggests a closed ecosystem that requires blind trust from the user.

Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.

🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
3Review mentions (all pages)
0External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 3 0
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
Homepage — no schema detected (entity gap)