Identity & Authority: ING – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

ING

(https://www.ing.es) 📸 Data Snapshot: October 3, 2026
Identity & Authority — The Lens

Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.

Identity & Authority Expert verifiability & Schema depth.
5 Impact Weight: 15 / 100
33% Reputation

A significant technical authority gap exists in the structured data; the site uses basic WebSite schema instead of the more appropriate FinancialService or Organization schema. There is no visible FCA-equivalent (Bank of Spain or CNMV) registration number linked directly in the provided text. Furthermore, the complete absence of H1-H6 tags in the heading hierarchy metadata suggests a technical implementation that doesn’t match the bank’s massive market authority.

The marketing tone is approachable (‘do your thing’), yet the performance claims are exceptionally grounded in verifiable metrics. For example, the 3% TAE offer for 3 months includes a representative example of a 50,000 € investment resulting in 370.88 € gross profit. This level of granular calculation eliminates the disconnect usually found in high-BS marketing.

Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.

🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
Homepage schema
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org/",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "name": "ING",
    "url": "https://www.ing.es/"
}
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
0Review mentions (all pages)
0External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 0 0