TradingView
(https://tradingview.com) 📸 Data Snapshot: June 20, 2026Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.
Authority is well-established through technical implementation and social footprint. The schema_json includes a complete Organization object with sameAs links to four major social platforms. The site references named entities like Scott Kidd Poteet and specific authors like LuxAlgo, who have verified footprints within the platform’s ecosystem, minimizing any credibility gap.
TradingView avoids making direct performance guarantees, instead framing performance within user-generated Trade ideas. Specific metrics provided, such as the 102 percent return mentioned in the MSFT analysis, are contextualized within historical EMA tests rather than presented as a platform promise. This transparency reduces the distance between claim and proof.
Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
Homepage schema
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"url": "https://www.tradingview.com",
"logo": "https://www.tradingview.com/static/images/logo-151x151.png",
"name": "TradingView",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/tradingview/",
"https://twitter.com/tradingview/",
"https://www.youtube.com/@TradingView",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/tradingview/"
]
}
/ideas/editors-picks/
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"item": {
"@id": "https://www.tradingview.com/ideas/",
"name": "Ideas"
}
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"item": {
"@id": "https://www.tradingview.com/ideas/editors-picks/",
"name": "Editors' picks"
}
}
]
}
/scripts/editors-picks/
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"item": {
"@id": "https://www.tradingview.com/scripts/",
"name": "Indicators and strategies"
}
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"item": {
"@id": "https://www.tradingview.com/scripts/editors-picks/",
"name": "Editors' picks"
}
}
]
}
/ideas/
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"item": {
"@id": "https://www.tradingview.com/ideas/",
"name": "Ideas"
}
}
]
}
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 524 | 1 |
| /ideas/editors-picks/ | 220 | 1 |
| /scripts/editors-picks/ | 157 | 1 |
| /ideas/ | 207 | 1 |
This page presents a snapshot of public data from TradingView, captured on June 20, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Identity & Authority signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to TradingView: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://tradingview.com to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.