Trust & Proof: Dalibo – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

Dalibo

(https://dalibo.com) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 26, 2026
Trust & Proof — The Lens

Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.

Trust & Proof Verifiable evidence vs. Trust Theatre.
12 Impact Weight: 20 / 100
60% Reputation

The site avoids common trust theatre traps like fake badges or verified review widgets, but it also lacks any verifiable proof paths. The [H2] Ce que disent nos clients section contains testimonials without names, company logos, or dates, making them unverifiable. With a proof_links_count of 0 across all pages, the claims of being a ‘reference’ in the field remain entirely internal and unsubstantiated.

The proof density is low, leaning heavily on the longevity of the brand (Since 2005) rather than recent evidence. While it lists technical features of PostgreSQL correctly, it fails to provide external validation points for its own service quality. The ratio of vague assertions like ‘réactivité et proximité’ to verifiable evidence is approximately 10:1.

Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.

🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
0Review mentions (all pages)
0External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 0 0
/philosophie/ 0 0
/support/ 0 0
/services/ 0 0
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
Homepage — no schema detected (entity gap)
/philosophie/ — no schema detected (entity gap)
/support/ — no schema detected (entity gap)
/services/ — no schema detected (entity gap)