Trust & Proof: KREA – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

KREA

(https://www.krea.sk) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 19, 2026
Trust & Proof — The Lens

Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.

Trust & Proof Verifiable evidence vs. Trust Theatre.
16 Impact Weight: 20 / 100
80% Reputation

With a review_count of 0 and a trust_theatre_flag of false, the site avoids the common trap of displaying unverified star ratings. However, while it displays a massive list of client IMGs, the proof_links_count is only 1, suggesting that most of these logos do not link to deep-dive case studies. The claim of having served ‘hundreds of clients’ is partially substantiated by the visible list of ~30 high-profile brands.

Proof density is concentrated in the client portfolio and the longevity claim (14 years). Out of the total character count (1935), a significant portion of the ‘weight’ comes from the list of named entities (Sony, Penta, Coca Cola, etc.). This ratio of named evidence to vague marketing speak is better than the industry average, keeping the overall BS score in the ‘Low’ range.

Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.

🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
0Review mentions (all pages)
1External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 0 1
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
Homepage — no schema detected (entity gap)