Reactome
(https://reactome.org) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 25, 2026Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.
Trust theatre is absent. While the data shows a review_count of 8, these appear to be internal system metrics or citations rather than marketing testimonials. The site provides a proof_links_count of 1 on most pages, but the real proof is in the citations of NIH grants (U24 HG012198) and the explicit Research Spotlight on the March 2025 Society of Toxicology paper by Tsai et al.
Proof density is near total. The site lists 42,784 literature references and provides a Recent News section with links to preprints and new publications in NAR 2026. This is a primary source of data, not a marketing wrapper for a secondary service.
Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.
🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 8 | 1 |
| /PathwayBrowser/ | 0 | 0 |
| /userguide/analysis/ | 4 | 1 |
| /documentation/ | 6 | 1 |
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
Homepage schema
[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "WebSite",
"url": "https://reactome.org/",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "SearchAction",
"target": "https://reactome.org/content/query?q={term}",
"query-input": "required name=term"
}
},
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"url": "https://reactome.org",
"logo": "https://reactome.org/templates/favourite/images/logo/logo.png",
"email": "help@reactome.org"
}
]
/userguide/analysis/
[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "WebSite",
"url": "https://reactome.org/",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "SearchAction",
"target": "https://reactome.org/content/query?q={term}",
"query-input": "required name=term"
}
},
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"url": "https://reactome.org",
"logo": "https://reactome.org/templates/favourite/images/logo/logo.png",
"email": "help@reactome.org"
}
]
/documentation/
[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "WebSite",
"url": "https://reactome.org/",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "SearchAction",
"target": "https://reactome.org/content/query?q={term}",
"query-input": "required name=term"
}
},
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"url": "https://reactome.org",
"logo": "https://reactome.org/templates/favourite/images/logo/logo.png",
"email": "help@reactome.org"
}
]
This page presents a snapshot of public data from Reactome, captured on May 25, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Trust & Proof signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to Reactome: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://reactome.org to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.