Identity & Authority: Zama – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

Zama

(https://zama.com) 📸 Data Snapshot: June 20, 2026
Identity & Authority — The Lens

Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.

Identity & Authority Expert verifiability & Schema depth.
0 Impact Weight: 15 / 100
0% Reputation

The site lacks any meta_title, meta_description, or schema_json, indicating a total technical credibility gap. There is no evidence of a founder, team members, or specialized certifications like ISO 27001 or CREST mentioned in the structured data. This expert footprint is completely missing, leading to a maximum penalty in authority verification.

The site’s review_count of 1 implies a claim of past performance or client satisfaction, yet there is no clean_text to substantiate what was actually achieved. There are no case studies, results, or named clients to bridge the gap between the trust signal and reality. The marketing tone is implied by the presence of a ‘review’ but is completely unsupported by evidence.

Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.

🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
Homepage — no schema detected (entity gap)
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
1Review mentions (all pages)
0External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 1 0