Obsidian
(https://obsidian.net) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 30, 2026Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.
A complete absence of structured data and a total technical blackout via HTTP 403 create a maximum identity gap. For a tech-focused entity, the failure to provide a clean technical implementation or even basic Organization schema represents a significant loss of professional authority. There are no named experts or founders with a digital footprint in the metadata, leaving the brand as an anonymous and inaccessible entity.
The site makes no bold performance claims, which paradoxically keeps the BS score lower than typical high-growth SaaS sites. However, it fails to meet any of the proof expectations defined in the industry dictionary, such as live product access or technical documentation. The disconnect lies in the vacuum between the existence of a domain and the total lack of evidence of a functioning software product.
Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 0 | 0 |
This page presents a snapshot of public data from Obsidian, captured on May 30, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Identity & Authority signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to Obsidian: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://obsidian.net to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.