Information Density: Yanko – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

Yanko

(https://yanko.com) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 28, 2026
Information Density — The Lens

Classify each sentence as substantive or hollow. Grounding markers — numbers, currencies, dates, technical units, named entities — outweigh marketing adjectives. When fluff sits right next to hard evidence, the fluff is forgiven.

Info Density Power-words vs. Substance ratio.
24 Impact Weight: 30 / 100
80% Reputation

The site contains zero marketing power words, resulting in a low fluff score in the headings. However, it also contains zero business substance, with the body text consisting entirely of technical server instructions in English and Spanish. The absolute absence of specific nouns, numbers, or commercial metrics results in a complete lack of information density regarding any business entity. There are no claims to measure, making the page functionally empty from a commercial perspective.

Information Density is read straight from the body copy: how much of the text carries grounded, checkable substance versus hollow filler. Below is the clean text the engine analyzed, then the industry’s known generic-claim patterns to weigh it against.

📝 The Narrative — clean text per page (the substance-vs-filler signal)
HOMEPAGE · THIN (https://yanko.com) Default website / Sitio web por defecto
[H2] If you see this page it is because you have reached the default website.
This should not happen under normal circumstances. Probably you are trying to access your website using a name
which has
not been configured on your website, or your DNS record is not pointing to the right server.

[H2] Si vd. ve esta página es porque ha llegado al sitio web por defecto.
Esto no debería suceder en circunstancias normales. Probablemente está intentando acceder a su
sitio web utilizando un
nombre que no ha sido configurado en su sitio web, o su registro de DNS no está apuntando al servidor
correcto.
605 chars
🧭 Industry Context — common generic-claim patterns in Unclear / Mixed / Unclassifiable Industry to weigh the text against
Generic Claims: trusted by leading companies, proven track record, the best in the industry, results that speak for themselves, your trusted partner, exceeding expectations…
Red Flags: no verifiable business identity or registration, claims expertise in unrelated fields simultaneously, stock photography throughout, no physical address or contact phone number, testimonials without full names or businesses, guaranteed outcomes for complex services…
Semantic Drift Patterns: homepage makes grand claims but sub-pages are thin on detail, positioning suggests specialist but services are generic, hero section is ambitious but content does not support it, multiple service areas with no depth in any single one, messaging changes tone and target audience across pages…
Proof Expectations: named clients or customers with verifiable identity, specific results with numbers, dates, and context, verifiable team credentials and professional backgrounds, third-party reviews on independent platforms, case studies with measurable outcomes, regulatory registrations relevant to claimed services…