Trust & Proof: 株式会社ディー・エヌ・エー | DeNA – Signal Evidence & AI Readability

株式会社ディー・エヌ・エー | DeNA

(https://dena.com) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 26, 2026
Trust & Proof — The Lens

Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.

Trust & Proof Verifiable evidence vs. Trust Theatre.
17 Impact Weight: 20 / 100
85% Reputation

The site displays zero reviews (review_count: 0) and makes few unsubstantiated performance claims, which prevents a high trust theatre score. It relies on internal news updates and IR reports for credibility rather than third-party endorsements. While it lacks external proof links in the crawled text, the specificity of its project names acts as a primary substantiator.

The ratio of evidence to assertions is high; for every claim of ‘challenging the new,’ the site provides a specific entity like ‘DeNA x AI’ or ‘Join Mobile Clinic.’ The NEWS section contains specific dates and entities, though the proof_links_count is low at 2 per page, indicating that while evidence exists, it is mostly hosted internally rather than linked to external verification sites.

Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.

🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
0Review mentions (all pages)
4External proof links (all pages)
PageReviewsProof links
/ (home) 0 0
/jp/ 0 2
/intl/ 0 2
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
Homepage — no schema detected (entity gap)
/jp/ — no schema detected (entity gap)
/intl/ — no schema detected (entity gap)
Explore the other reputation pillars for 株式会社ディー・エヌ・エー | DeNA