Based on 1884 businesses audited.
Neil Gaiman has 19.5 points more reputation than the average for Arts, Culture & Entertainment.
Arts, Culture & Entertainment Reputation: Neil Gaiman (neilgaiman.com)
This is a high-substance, low-BS site that suffers only from technical antiquity. It proves its value through a massive archival footprint rather than modern marketing persuasion. The high score in the authority pillar is purely a reflection of poor technical metadata and legacy social links, not a lack of real-world credibility.
Arts, Culture & Entertainment Reputation: Neil Gaiman (neilgaiman.com)
The site is a definitive example of an Arts, Culture & Entertainment platform centered on a primary creator. The content confirms the classification by providing an exhaustive archive of literary, cinematic, and dramatic works rather than generic service offerings.
“The score of 87 is driven almost entirely by the technical Identity and Authority pillar due to missing structured data and minor heading errors. The first four pillars, which measure content bullshit, scored near-zero because the site backs every marketing claim with specific, dated, and named evidence.”