WikiLeaks
(https://wikileaks.org) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 24, 2026Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.
Authority is the only area with significant scoring penalties due to a technical implementation gap. Despite claiming global intelligence expertise, the site has null schema_json across all pages, lacking basic Organization or Person structured data. While high-profile names like Julian Assange and Baltasar Garzón are mentioned, they are not connected to a digital footprint via sameAs links or Person schema, creating a disconnect between the site’s authority claims and its modern technical SEO execution.
The site makes bold performance claims, such as having a ‘perfect record in document authentication,’ which is a high-bar assertion. However, unlike marketing sites, it attempts to back these with references to more than 28,000 academic papers and court filings. The disconnect is minor and primarily related to the lack of live, third-party verification for its current ‘perfection’ claim in the 2026 temporal context.
Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 5 | 2 |
| /-Leaks-.html | 6 | 2 |
| /-News-.html | 18 | 2 |
| /What-is-WikiLeaks.html | 4 | 2 |
This page presents a snapshot of public data from WikiLeaks, captured on May 24, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Identity & Authority signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to WikiLeaks: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://wikileaks.org to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.