Obsidian
(https://obsidian.md) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 25, 2026Inspect the JSON-LD. Is there an Organization or Person schema, and does it carry sameAs links to real external profiles (LinkedIn, socials)? Missing schema or no identity declaration signals an anonymous entity.
Authority is hindered by a total lack of structured data; the schema_json is null for all pages, including the homepage. There are no sameAs links or Organization schema to establish official entity status in the knowledge graph. While the site mentions specific technical experts by name (e.g., Viacheslav Slinko, Martin Schenck), these individuals are not connected to a digital footprint via Person schema within the site’s own metadata. The technical credibility is further damaged by the unresolved links for core product features.
The marketing tone is restrained and focuses on functionality rather than hyperbolic performance claims. However, the disconnect is found in the demonstration of its own reliability: the site claims to help you ‘organize’ and ‘connect,’ yet the internal link structure for /download, /publish, and /sync is broken. This creates a performance paradox where the tool for ‘thinking clearly’ fails to maintain its own site architecture. There are no claims of ‘increasing productivity by X%’ which helps keep the BS score lower than typical SaaS competitors.
Identity & Authority is read from the structured data first: whether the site declares who it is in machine-readable schema, with verifiable identity links. Below is the schema captured per page, then the external proof links that support (or fail to support) that identity.
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: identity chains, entity gaps
🛡️ Trust Signals — external proof links that back the declared identity
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 0 | 0 |
| /download/ | 0 | 0 |
| /publish/ | 0 | 0 |
| /sync/ | 0 | 0 |
This page presents a snapshot of public data from Obsidian, captured on May 25, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Identity & Authority signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to Obsidian: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://obsidian.md to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.