Obsidian
(https://obsidian.md) 📸 Data Snapshot: May 25, 2026Count trust words (review, testimonial, rating, verified) against real outbound proof links (Google, Trustpilot, Clutch, G2, Yelp). Lots of trust language with zero verification links is trust theatre. Unlinked logo galleries count against it.
The site avoids traditional trust theatre like fake review carousels or unlinked ‘As seen in’ logos, reflected by a trust_theatre_flag of false. However, it lacks any external proof paths; the review_count and proof_links_count are both 0 across all examined pages. While the mention of specific community developers like Liam Cain and Michael Brenan adds a layer of community-vetted credibility, there are no external links to third-party reviews (G2, Capterra) or verified customer case studies.
Proof density is localized to product features rather than external validation. The site provides specific evidence of what the software can do through mentions of specific plugins and technical capabilities (open API, Markdown-backed), but zero evidence of market adoption or user satisfaction. Out of the 4 pages analyzed, only the homepage contains substance, while the other 3 are empty 404 placeholders, leading to a low total proof density for the site’s overall footprint.
Trust & Proof is read by weighing trust language against real verification. Below is the page-by-page tally of review mentions and external proof links, then the schema markup that may (or may not) declare verifiable ratings and identity proof.
🛡️ Trust Signals — reviews, proof links, trust-theatre check
| Page | Reviews | Proof links |
|---|---|---|
| / (home) | 0 | 0 |
| /download/ | 0 | 0 |
| /publish/ | 0 | 0 |
| /sync/ | 0 | 0 |
🔗 Identity & Technical Layer — schema JSON-LD: declared ratings, reviews & identity proof
This page presents a snapshot of public data from Obsidian, captured on May 25, 2026, to show how machine logic reads Trust & Proof signals into an AI reputation evaluation.
Purpose: This data is presented under “Fair Use” for the purpose of independent signal analysis, allowing readers to see the raw signals behind the reputation score.
Notice to Obsidian: This analysis is part of a non-adversarial audit conducted by 1 Euro SEO. The results are intended as professional feedback to help improve any website’s machine-readability and authority signals. The evaluation is free, and any company can request a fresh audit at any time.
Any company can use the insights for free and improve its voice. When a company has updated its content, it can always submit a new audit request, which will be reflected in a new current score.
To all users: You are encouraged to visit the live site at https://obsidian.md to view the most current version of its content and see directly what this company is about and what it offers.