AI Reputation Analysis and Signal Evaluation – Skins & Needles

B
Reputation Level
Beauty, Cosmetics & Personal Care
54.6 Avg Reputation

Based on 1453 businesses audited.

Brand AI Reputation

Beauty, Cosmetics & Personal Care Reputation: Skins & Needles (skinsnneedles.co.uk)

http://skinsnneedles.co.uk 📍 Industry: Beauty, Cosmetics & Personal Care
36 Reputation / 100

Skins & Needles is a ‘Template Ghost’—a professional-looking facade that hasn’t been proofread. The inclusion of an FAQ for a Swiss magazine retailer on a Teesside tattoo studio site is a terminal BS signal that suggests the ‘award-winning’ content is likely copied boilerplate. The site fails the most basic test of business substance: knowing what it actually sells and where it is located.

Info Density Power-words vs. Substance ratio.
15 50% Reputation
View evidence →
Semantic Coherence Homepage promise vs. Sub-page reality.
4 20% Reputation
View evidence →
Trust & Proof Verifiable evidence vs. Trust Theatre.
10 50% Reputation
View evidence →
Commodity Fingerprint Detection of industry clichés/templates.
5 33% Reputation
View evidence →
Identity & Authority Expert verifiability & Schema depth.
2 13% Reputation
View evidence →

Beauty, Cosmetics & Personal Care Reputation: Skins & Needles (skinsnneedles.co.uk)

Reputation: 36 / 100

The brand is a Tattoo and Piercing studio, which fits within Personal Care. However, there is a fundamental content mismatch where significant portions of the site content refer to a Swiss magazine retailer, suggesting a catastrophic template error.

“The score of 36 is primarily driven by the extreme failure in Semantic Coherence (8/8 points for drift) and Technical Credibility (5/5 points). The presence of 'Tab Content' across three different sub-pages and the contradictory Swiss shipping FAQ indicates that the site's signals are not backed by human-verified substance.”

Verified Analysis Date: May 22, 2026 © 1EuroSEO Independent Evaluator — Non-Sponsored Result